Food Safety Intelligence Hub · official evidence review
Start with a question. Review what was observed, check the source and decide what needs further verification—not what is safe.
The contact form is not accepting messages yet. Source status, methodology and known limitations are published on each page.
01 · Evidence review
What has been notified, and which records deserve a closer look?
EU RASFF · partial historical notifications, 2020+
Investigate hazardsNext check: Start with your product and date window; review the original notification before changing controls.
02 · Evidence review
What official recall evidence is relevant to a verification review?
US FDA · historical enforcement recalls; no FSIS records
Review recall evidenceNext check: Compare the named product and firm against your own supplier records. A recall is not a supplier rating.
03 · Evidence review
What is being notified, and what still needs legal-status verification?
WTO ePing · notifications, proposals and revisions; not enacted law
Review proposed changesNext check: Check the official document, comment deadline and destination-market requirements.
04 · Evidence review
Which official standards belong in the evidence file?
Codex · official document index; not a numerical limits database
Review standards evidenceNext check: Verify the standard version and applicability; pair it with audits, testing and your own records.
The latest database integrity check reports 32,669 stored official RASFF records. Source freshness and coverage are shown inside the module. Metadata checks do not establish a live feed. CDC outbreaks are historical/stale; UK and Canada alerts are partial manual samples. FDA Import Alerts are a static private pilot only (not a connected official feed); FDA Import Refusals remain blocked/unavailable.
Check source statusDaily source checks overdue — 0/3 completed (FDA, CDC, WTO). Stored database counts are unaffected; see Data Health for detail. View source status
These dashboards are built on verified official records with known coverage. Each states what it measures and over which period — historical or partial snapshots, never a live feed. Other sources and their development status are listed further down.
European Commission
See which hazards, product categories and origins EU authorities actually flag across borders — a direct input for supplier verification, testing plans and specification reviews.
32,669 stored official notifications, partial public coverage 2020–2026, manually imported 14 Oct 2026. Notification frequency is an enforcement and trade signal, not incidence or country safety.
Open RASFF intelligenceU.S. Food and Drug Administration
Check whether a firm, product category or recall reason appears in official FDA food enforcement history before a supplier review or audit.
29,485 historical FDA food enforcement records; Hub import completed 14 Oct 2026, stored FDA publication dates through 7 Oct 2026. Historical classified records, not active recalls or a live alert service; USDA FSIS not connected.
Browse FDA recall recordsAdvanced aggregate dashboard — Can intermittently time out on large queries; the records browser above is the reliable path.
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Learn which foods, settings and etiologies are repeatedly implicated in officially reported US outbreaks — evidence for HACCP review, root-cause analysis and training.
24,729 voluntarily reported Food-mode outbreaks, 1998–2023; source data updated 20 Dec 2024. Reporting is incomplete, lagged and retrospectively revised; not current incidence.
Open outbreak intelligenceUK Food Standards Agency
Review published UK allergy alerts, product recalls and food alerts for action with their revisions when checking a product or supplier against UK enforcement communication.
Bounded snapshot of 500 alerts created 3 Jun 2023 – 15 Oct 2026, verified 16 Oct 2026. Not complete FSA history or illness incidence; a dated snapshot, not continuously updated.
Open UK FSA alertsHealth Canada / Canadian Food Inspection Agency
Cross-check Canadian official recall alerts and historical Food notices by class and category when assessing a supplier or ingredient with Canadian market exposure.
421 four-category alerts (2021–2026) plus 4,050 historical Food notices (2011–2021), separate manual snapshots. Not all Canadian notices or current activity.
Open Canada recallsEuropean Commission
See which product categories and issue types recur in official cross-border non-compliances with fraud suspicions — context for vulnerability assessments such as VACCP.
All 8 published 2026 monthly reports (Jan–Aug), 1,476 reported suspicions in aggregate. Suspicions are not proven fraud and not market incidence.
Open fraud suspicionsWorld Trade Organization
Track official SPS and evidence-screened food-relevant TBT notifications, revisions and comment periods that can change market-access requirements before they are adopted.
58,013 evidence-screened notification rows from 106,163 reconciled source rows; workbook checked 14 Oct 2026. Notifications are proposals and revisions, not laws in force.
Open regulatory intelligenceEuropean Food Safety Authority
Benchmark EU monitoring expectations: comparable programme-year aggregates distinguishing MRL exceedance from non-compliance after measurement uncertainty.
EU MACP programme years 2021–2024 with rotating commodity baskets; manual verified snapshots. Partial scope; not commodity-level trends or toxicological risk.
Open EFSA EU residuesUSDA Agricultural Marketing Service
Use one of the most rigorous residue monitoring programmes to inform sampling plans and supplier discussions, with sample and analytical-result denominators kept strictly separate.
2024 programme year: 9,872 distinct samples and 2,872,073 analytical results as verified aggregates. Detection is not a legal exceedance; no result-level access.
Open PDP 2024 aggregatesThe full source registry, including partial, blocked and not-yet-connected sources. Source-specific records stay separate. Related context is not independent corroboration.
Intelligence domain
Official notifications, recalls, alerts and reported outbreaks. Each source keeps its own unit, geography and date semantics.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Primary food/feed entries, not recalls, injuries or unique incidents. Annual source reconciliation failed; no reporting dataset imported.
Intelligence domain
Aggregate residue and occurrence evidence with explicit sample denominators. Detection is not exceedance or toxicological risk.
World Health Organization
Inspect a unit-consistent, source-traceable WHO chemical occurrence subset without inferring legal exceedance or safety risk.
Intelligence domain
Proposed measures, standards indexes, legal acts and import-control sources. Notifications are not laws in force.
FAO / World Health Organization
Search official Codex standards, guidelines and codes of practice by reference, committee, type and modified year.
European Union
Search a curated official set of EU food and feed legal acts with distinct publication, commencement and application dates.
Australian Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
Published dated food-failure entries, not unique consignments, recalls or country/supplier risk. No matched inspection denominator.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Static policy index with official Foods and Brazil page associations; not firm findings or shipment refusals.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Review observed FDA refusal activity by product, charge, firm, origin and time, with shipment-line deduplication.
USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service
Analyze imported meat, poultry and egg lots presented for reinspection, refused weights and refusal reasons.
Intelligence domain
Narrow evidence sources requiring extra interpretation: fraud suspicions, non-causal adverse-event aggregates and blocked sampling.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Official food, dietary supplement and cosmetic adverse-event reporting provenance without causality, incidence or consumer profiling claims.
USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service
Review FSIS establishment-specific microbiological product sampling with program, method and denominator safeguards.
How to read the hub
Every module should identify its source, connection state, freshness, completeness and analytical version before presenting conclusions.
Stored official-source records are available; the module shows its verified freshness.
Synthetic records support interface evaluation and are never presented as live evidence.
No feed or finished analysis exists. Cadence and completeness remain unverified.
Signal frequency reflects observed notification and enforcement activity—not incidence, prevalence, product safety or country safety. Outputs support prioritization, not company-specific risk assessment.
European Commission RASFFThe contact form is not accepting messages yet. Source status, methodology and known limitations are published on each page.